Wiezer Walley wrote:both people? Try over 450+ cities last I heard and hundreds of thousands of people. The next one will surpass that count. But I guess some people like having big brother running up the national debt and making you pay for it. Yeah that's real cool.
KevinP (Stabby McShankyou) wrote:
and I'm NOT a pedo. everyone knows i've got a wheelchair fetish.
KevinP (Stabby McShankyou) wrote:
and I'm NOT a pedo. everyone knows i've got a wheelchair fetish.
Harrington (Fiber Faber) wrote:If you are tired of the government spending your money for you then why don't you vote them out of officeI was going to suggest moving out of the country. I remember the JBO Tea Party crowd suggesting that to everyone else frequently over the last few years.
Harrington (Fiber Faber) wrote:There is 300 million + people in this country. Even if there was a total of 250,000 people that still is not even 1% of the population. I guess some people like following rouge Republican movements that not even 1% of the population gives a @!#$ about.
OHV notec wrote:I was going to suggest moving out of the country. I remember the JBO Tea Party crowd suggesting that to everyone else frequently over the last few years.
Quiklilcav wrote:I don't remember off the top of my head(you can google if you want numbers), but I think the anti-Iraq war rallies where probably at least as large if not considerably larger. I laughed at them because at that point I supported the war(and I will admit I was dead wrong) and I laugh at these people now.Harrington (Fiber Faber) wrote:There is 300 million + people in this country. Even if there was a total of 250,000 people that still is not even 1% of the population. I guess some people like following rouge Republican movements that not even 1% of the population gives a @!#$ about.
Name me the last movement that got that much of a turn out, and you might have a chance of making a point. The fact that that many people took off from work to show up means something. And it's not just Republicans, although you keep hearing the media say that, and repeating it as fact. There's something new for you. LOL.
OHV notec wrote:I was going to suggest moving out of the country. I remember the JBO Tea Party crowd suggesting that to everyone else frequently over the last few years.
Quiklilcav wrote:If you go back through those threads, you will notice a big difference, though. The people who were told to leave the country were bashing the country, not opposing changes to it. There is a huge difference when you say things like "f&%k this country", or "this country sucks", which has been thrown around many threads since this forum started. The people who are showing up at these demonstrations all have a common theme: they love the USA, but they are not willing to put up with this government trying to turn us into a socialist nation. None of them are going around hating the country.In your views they where bashing the country. In reality they where doing mostly the same things you are now... criticizing the leadership and its decisions. I was one of them.
Jay T wrote:These tea parties are only the start. Glad I am part of it.I'm glad you're part of the silly hysteria too, because I now have something more to laugh at. I suppose that means you think I'm brainwashed too, and I'd retort that maybe you shouldn't buy into everything you hear. There is a massive twisting of what is/has been happening in this world - and you might be surprised to learn that BOTH sides(definitely including your own) are massively twisting the truth and leading their own flocks effectively as such. I'd like to say its the blind leading the blind, but its more like the far-sighted trying to rally their fellow far-sided minions in a campaign against the "evil" near-sighted hordes. Neither side can see much clearly.
Quiklilcav wrote:Harrington (Fiber Faber) wrote:There is 300 million + people in this country. Even if there was a total of 250,000 people that still is not even 1% of the population. I guess some people like following rouge Republican movements that not even 1% of the population gives a @!#$ about.
Name me the last movement that got that much of a turn out, and you might have a chance of making a point. The fact that that many people took off from work to show up means something. And it's not just Republicans, although you keep hearing the media say that, and repeating it as fact. There's something new for you. LOL.
I don't have to name a movement that has had a stronger showing (but I can, see below), you said in another thread the this movement is a majority, a statement that has no truth to it at all and yet you still still try to play it off as fact. The fact that a small minority of people took the day off work means squat and has no relevance to proving this is a majority movement. The fact that a bunch of illegal immigrants took the day off to protest immigration reform must mean something too right, I bet they had a larger turn out then the tea parties. LOL
Prove this movement has an equal number of Republicans to Democrats. You can't and as usual you are trying to play off your opinion as fact.
OHV notec wrote:I was going to suggest moving out of the country. I remember the JBO Tea Party crowd suggesting that to everyone else frequently over the last few years.
If you go back through those threads, you will notice a big difference, though. The people who were told to leave the country were bashing the country, not opposing changes to it. There is a huge difference when you say things like "f&%k this country", or "this country sucks", which has been thrown around many threads since this forum started. The people who are showing up at these demonstrations all have a common theme: they love the USA, but they are not willing to put up with this government trying to turn us into a socialist nation. None of them are going around hating the country.
KevinP (Stabby McShankyou) wrote:
and I'm NOT a pedo. everyone knows i've got a wheelchair fetish.
Harrington (Fiber Faber) wrote:So the core beliefs of this group are shockingly Republican, yet there are Democrats involved even though they are the party of socialism so say Republicans, seems kind of fishy to me, once again trying to burn both ends of the candle at the same time. The hypocrisy of right wingers has no bounds.
wysiwyg wrote:i would say they bang, they don't really pound so much. but if
you want to bump, then they will bump and hit real hard and a lot good.
Wiezer Walley wrote:SHORT HAND- Ignorant? You are some young kid with no college education and no life experience. So in other words you have NO CREDIBILITY!! Can one of the people that are laughing at the ones who attend/will attend the protests pleasse explain what is to laugh about when people are tired of the government spending money we don't have, rising the national debt by the day which WE will have to pay back and so will our next generation. PLEASE STUPID FUKIN PEOPLE TELL ME YOUR LOGIC BECAUSE RIGHT NOW YOU REALLY LOOK STUPID. Actually makes me sad for your mothers.
Wiezer Walley wrote:SHORT HAND- Ignorant? You are some young kid with no college education and no life experience. So in other words you have NO CREDIBILITY!! Can one of the people that are laughing at the ones who attend/will attend the protests pleasse explain what is to laugh about when people are tired of the government spending money we don't have, rising the national debt by the day which WE will have to pay back and so will our next generation. PLEASE STUPID FUKIN PEOPLE TELL ME YOUR LOGIC BECAUSE RIGHT NOW YOU REALLY LOOK STUPID. Actually makes me sad for your mothers.
KevinP (Stabby McShankyou) wrote:
and I'm NOT a pedo. everyone knows i've got a wheelchair fetish.
Mr.Goodwrench-G.T. wrote:Government spending went up tremendously early 70's, debt quadruple and set a unprecedented record during the 80's, and escalated north during the new millennium, and yet oddly enough no "Tea Party." And what's was worse, that spending went for all the wrong reasons. So why wasn't anybody angry then and did a revolt; or are these being conducted because of convenient timing? The lack of a appearance in the past, only equals zero substance today.