lol... I wonder if they have backups for the data that used to be on there. I'd hate to be the Wiki-fixer if someone decided to screw with everything on Wikipedia!
lmao
A self-described "war president," ..... " oh my ,how impressive " barfs ...........
gawd dang a ding dong doo ..... can he ride a nuke whilst in a fetal position ?
guess not ....
oh, and i suppose he went to Dick's School of weapons and strategy ...
give this idiot a chainsaw and maybe you have something ..
although trees don't hit back, it's a far fight .
EzTrip wrote:lmao
A self-described "war president," ..... " oh my ,how impressive " barfs ...........
gawd dang a ding dong doo ..... can he ride a nuke whilst in a fetal position ?
guess not ....
oh, and i suppose he went to Dick's School of weapons and strategy ...
give this idiot a chainsaw and maybe you have something ..
although trees don't hit back, it's a far fight .
I hate to sound like your dad, but what the F are you talking about EzTrip...
______________________________________________________________
ToBoGgAn wrote:we are gonna take it in the ass and like it, cause thats what america does.
Slo2pt2 (Projekt Unknown?) wrote:One my SON is ADHD N.O.S and Autistic Spectrum Disorder. I will nto medicate him he will battle throught this himself and learn to control it.
Glace wrote:
I hate to sound like your dad, but what the F are you talking about EzTrip...
i'm venting with some very obscure references, if that's alright with you sir ...
Dr. Strangelove I presume?
Anyhow...
SPITfire: Entries that get defaced a few times (I think it's 6 times within a 2 week period) go to the image of the article last created before the original defacement, and usually at that point, any alterations have to be submitted for review. Bush, Bin Laden, Pope Benedict (The EMPEROR!)... these are all articles that get locked occasionally to new users until problems blow over... after that if the article is defaced, it's locked permanently and all submissions must be submitted to a review committee.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
I take anything on Wikipedia like a grain of salt...
You ought to. However, a good article with cited references is as good as an Encyclopaedia Britannica article. And usually it's more up to date.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
wait what is going on, i dont get it
I think the page was defaced before it was locked.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
GAM (The Kilted One) wrote:You ought to. However, a good article with cited references is as good as an Encyclopaedia Britannica article. And usually it's more up to date.
and thats been proven in studies.
Creative Draft Art Media Forums
Here's a link to Wikipedia's protected pages. Everything from "Gay" to "Dora the Explorer" is on it. People will mess with anything.
1989.. wha?
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
Hey now... when you can get a comprehensive list of Big boob dancers that have done XXX at the same place you can get a run down of the Hindenberg Disaster, along with a explanation of the Turbo Encabulator vs Retro Encabulator, and why the Retro Encabulator is outpaced by the Turbo Encabulator's dynamic variance load buffering abilities, even though it's over 30 years older....
Hell, that's my kinda encyclopaedia.
Transeat In Exemplum: Let this stand as the example.
